Out and About
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b46b/7b46b7a7aa7eecba4ade61eb01f515cc4a436862" alt=""
And, regarding subscriptions for Politico, I saw the following and it made me laugh:
I just want to make sure I’m following this correctly:
Politico: “Hey government, what have you been up to?”
The Government: “We’ve been doing A, B and C.”
Politico: “Great, Thanks!”
Politico: “Hey Government, just so you know, you’ve been doing A, B and C.”
The Government: “Thanks for letting us know! Here is $8.4 million annually.”
Millions of dollars for subscriptions to something called Politico Pro, a service which helps the government know what the government is doing. Reality: The government purchasing favorable coverage.
And, if you hear that someone is going to be arrested for looking into what the government is spending our money on – that could not happen – constitutionally. We are supposed to have a “regular statement and account of the receipts and expenditures.” And – it is to be published. That is the legal ad I want in our newspapers. The problem is, define regular. And, why hasn’t anyone been publishing this list?
“Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7: No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of the receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published.
This statement is directly from the United States Constitution and is commonly referred to as the “Appropriations Clause;” it essentially means that no government funds can be spent unless Congress has first approved an appropriation (a law authorizing the spending) for that purpose, and the public must be regularly informed about how government money is being used through published statements of receipts and expenditures.
Quote of the Week: Imagine a political party so corrupt they need to convince their people that accountability is illegal. Unknown. (I don’t think we need to use our imagination anymore.)